<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msinfluentials.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx</link><description>Recently I had a very interesting incident. I wrote an article some time in 2008 and the publisher paid me a little bit of money for it. That means the publisher must send a report to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS - the U.S. tax department) reporting</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12719</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:21:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12719</guid><dc:creator>steve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hi, what if you already emailed your ss # to a lawyer who requested it. What can you do to see if your # has been comprimised?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12719" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12713</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:33:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12713</guid><dc:creator>DmitryK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;in regards to not reporting payments of less than $600: surely this can be bypassed by spreading the whole sum in $599 chunks across multiple days (and/or multiple people)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12713" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12641</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:29:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12641</guid><dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I work for the US Dept. of Defense. They don&amp;#39;t use your SSN, they use your employee ID number. Anyone want to guess what that is?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12641" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12591</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:42:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12591</guid><dc:creator>Don</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Publishing SSNs does not remove their value. It enhances it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12591" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12590</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:11:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12590</guid><dc:creator>ameyer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect that the reason the credit card breaches get far more media attention is because those breaches cause a direct and imediate cost to the credit card companies. Identity theft however tends to hit the little guy much harder, the person who&amp;#39;s identity has been stolen tends to incure the greater cost.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The credit card companies tend to be less forgiving of debts incured in your name by a breach of your personal information then by a breach caused by a breach in the chain of a legitimate transaction, for which they hold the liabality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When your identity has been stolen they can claim that they entered into the agreement in good faith based on what they believed to be legitimate information suposedly validated by the government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12590" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12589</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:47:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12589</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Martin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree that all SSNs should be published to remove any value they might have as an authenticator. All this attention is being paid to a number that lives in thousands of places. Have you ever been to a doctor or hospital? Believe me, I work in health care IT and you have a lot more to worry about from their systems than from an email. It would be child&amp;#39;s play to get into almost any hospital&amp;#39;s network and steal SSNs, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12589" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12583</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:18:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12583</guid><dc:creator>Don</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A 1099 is not required for a payment less than $600. &amp;nbsp;There was mo reason to give them you SSN if the check was less than that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12583" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12579</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:48:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12579</guid><dc:creator>gbromage</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it comes down to what Bruce Schneier has been saying for years - the need to keep Idetification and Authentication as separate things. SSN is good for Identity, but bad as an authenticator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12579" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12578</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:16:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12578</guid><dc:creator>jesper</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The SSN is certainly treated as an authenticator today. By extension, therefore, it is sensitive information. Whether that is a good idea or not is an interesting question. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12578" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12577</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:02:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12577</guid><dc:creator>Michael Dickey</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The real question is: &amp;quot;Is your SSN supposed to be private/sensitive information?&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12577" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12576</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:48:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12576</guid><dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There are likely about 150,000 - 250,000 people that get &amp;quot;legitimate&amp;quot; access to your SSN over its lifetime to begin with, so the incremental risk associated with this email is pretty small. I say publish all SSNs so we can eliminate the facade of secrecy and move on to a more secure solution for authentication. SSNs are still fine for identification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12576" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx#12572</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:46:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:12572</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Same sort of thing happens here in California when dealing with Title/Escrow Companies. &amp;nbsp;They ask for all sorts of information to &amp;quot;setup your account&amp;quot; that isn&amp;#39;t relevant to their services. &amp;nbsp;And if you have ever been inside a title company you will notice that information security isn&amp;#39;t high on their priority list. &amp;nbsp;Filing cabinets all over the place with all sorts of sensitive records.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12572" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>