<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msinfluentials.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Need a laptop with a TPM?</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2007/10/31/need-a-laptop-with-a-tpm.aspx</link><description>For the third time in a week someone asked the question &amp;quot;If I want to use BitLocker with a Trusted Platforms Module (TPM), which computer should I get?&amp;quot; Wonderful question. For some reason, the hardvare vendors seem to treat the TPM chip as</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Need a laptop with a TPM?</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2007/10/31/need-a-laptop-with-a-tpm.aspx#7191</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:37:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7191</guid><dc:creator>Robert Millan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You don&amp;#39;t have to be paranoid, or lack understanding to be worried about Treacherous Computing. &amp;nbsp;When you think about the implications of the evil features it *does* include, it&amp;#39;s normal you want to avoid it like the plague.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m talking, of course, about remote attestation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7191" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Need a laptop with a TPM?</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2007/10/31/need-a-laptop-with-a-tpm.aspx#7190</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:04:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7190</guid><dc:creator>matt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Once enabled in BIOS, tpm.msc is a reliable mechanism for determing the specs of your TPM. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7190" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Need a laptop with a TPM?</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2007/10/31/need-a-laptop-with-a-tpm.aspx#7189</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:47:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7189</guid><dc:creator>Harry Johnston</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I suspect the problem is that TPM was originally promoted as the magic bullet that would solve all computer security problems. &amp;nbsp;Nonsense, of course, as was pointed out numerous times. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately the upshot is that it makes people uneasy if they don&amp;#39;t know any of the useful things it actually /can/ do - which I suspect not many people do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, the only example I&amp;#39;ve seen of it being useful is BitLocker. &amp;nbsp;Do you have any others?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; ... just to provide an example of the reasons TPM is treated with suspicion, I remember hearing that it would allow applications to know whether an input keystroke was really from the keyboard or not. &amp;nbsp;That&amp;#39;s not a good thing if you&amp;#39;re using a computer remotely, or using scripting to perform a silent installation, so I was left with the impression that TPM had the potential to break essential functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then there&amp;#39;s all the FUD, such as the story that only software authorized by Microsoft would run on TPM computers. &amp;nbsp;I knew that one was wrong, but how do you explain that to the paranoid?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I guess the summary is that customers needing TPM will probably know enough to go looking for it; customers who don&amp;#39;t will probably be worried by it. &amp;nbsp;Doesn&amp;#39;t add up to a good advertising point. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Need a laptop with a TPM?</title><link>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2007/10/31/need-a-laptop-with-a-tpm.aspx#7188</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:52:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7188</guid><dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was extremely frustrated the other day when trying to find a motherboard with the TPM chipset. &amp;nbsp;I was building an office workstation and wanted to be able to leverage Bitlocker to protect the drive contents. &amp;nbsp;As mentioned in this article I was unable to locate an appropriate motherboard and ended up using a usb drive as my key. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s hard to understand why the TPM chipset hasn&amp;#39;t taken off.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7188" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>