http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/04/22/quantum-security.aspxThe May 2008 issue of TechNet Magazine is out. It has an article in it that I have been wanting to write for a long time, called Quantum Security . In it I posit the argument that there are some fundamental laws of security, similar to the laws of physicsenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/04/22/quantum-security.aspx#7639Sat, 03 May 2008 13:43:57 GMT91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7639Hugo<p>You can&#39;t add mitigation costs to ALE. If you do that, ALE value doesn&#39;t work the way it should.</p> <p>What you can do, is compare ALE with mitigation costs and see if it is worth mitigation risk.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7639" width="1" height="1">http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/jesper/archive/2008/04/22/quantum-security.aspx#7632Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:12:21 GMT91db4bc3-5a69-4a9f-94bf-eedb569902ab:7632SJWK<p>I enjoyed the article. I didn&#39;t see the phrase &#39;the law of unintened consequences&#39; in the article. To trite perhaps?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7632" width="1" height="1">