<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://msinfluentials.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">Jesper&amp;#39;s Blog</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="4.1.40407.4157">Community Server</generator><updated>2008-12-24T02:40:00Z</updated><entry><title>2010 PADI Instructor Manual Available Online Now</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2010/02/11/2010-padi-instructor-manual-available-online-now.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2010/02/11/2010-padi-instructor-manual-available-online-now.aspx</id><published>2010-02-12T05:52:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-12T05:52:00Z</updated><content type="html">If you are a PADI dive professional, or are considering being one, you may be interested in the 2010 Digital Instructor Manual . PADI graciously posted it online for free, allowing anyone, not just instructors, to access it. If you are interested in taking the instructor exam this year, this is great news since it saves you the money it used to cost to buy the manual. The new version of the manual contains all the standards but not all the details on how to teach the courses that used to be in the...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2010/02/11/2010-padi-instructor-manual-available-online-now.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22038" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Diving" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Diving/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Fake Anti-Malware is Apparently Microsoft's Fault</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/24/fake-anti-malware-is-apparently-microsoft-s-fault.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/24/fake-anti-malware-is-apparently-microsoft-s-fault.aspx</id><published>2009-10-24T17:20:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-24T17:20:00Z</updated><content type="html">Munir Kotadia, an IT Journalist in Australia, has finally managed to figure out how to blame Microsoft for the fake anti-malware epidemic. Apparently, the reason is that &amp;quot;Microsoft could save the world from fake security applications by introducing a whitelist for apps from legitimate security firms&amp;quot; and, presumably, has neglected to do so out of sheer malice. I&amp;#39;m clearly not a thinker at the same level as Munir; maybe that is why I don&amp;#39;t fully get this white list he proposes. Does...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/24/fake-anti-malware-is-apparently-microsoft-s-fault.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>How Delegation Privileges Are Represented In Active Directory</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/20/how-delegation-privileges-are-represented-in-active-directory.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/20/how-delegation-privileges-are-represented-in-active-directory.aspx</id><published>2009-10-21T04:21:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-21T04:21:00Z</updated><content type="html">One of the last areas where more tool support is needed is in monitoring the various attributes in Active Directory (AD). Recently I got curious about the delegation flags, and, more to the point, how to tell which accounts have been trusted for delegation. This could be of great import if, for instance, you have to produce reports of privileged accounts. KB 305144 gives a certain amount of detail about how delegation rights are presented in Active Directory. However, it is unclear from that article...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/20/how-delegation-privileges-are-represented-in-active-directory.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21954" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Windows Security" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Windows+Security/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Web Of Trust: RIP</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/14/web-of-trust-rip.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/14/web-of-trust-rip.aspx</id><published>2009-10-14T05:16:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-14T05:16:00Z</updated><content type="html">It&amp;#39;s official. I just received an e-mail from Thawte notifying me that, as of November 16, 2009, the most innovative and useful idea in PKI since its inception, the Web of Trust , will die. Thawte was founded 14 years ago by Mark Shuttleworth. The primary purpose was to get around the then-current U.S. export restrictions on cryptography. Shuttleworth also had an idea that drew from PGP: rather than force everyone who wanted an e-mail certificate to get verified by some central entity - and pay...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/14/web-of-trust-rip.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21948" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /><category term="Thinking differently" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Thinking+differently/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Passwords are here to stay</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/11/passwords-are-here-to-stay.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/11/passwords-are-here-to-stay.aspx</id><published>2009-10-11T05:54:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-11T05:54:00Z</updated><content type="html">At least for the short to medium term. That is the, quite obvious, conclusion drawn in a Newsweek article entitled &amp;quot;Building a Better Password.&amp;quot; The article goes inside the CyLab at Carnegie-Mellon University to understand how passwords may one day be replaced. It is interesting reading all around. The article is not without some &amp;quot;really?&amp;quot; moments though, such as this quote: The idea of passphrases isn&amp;#39;t new. But no one has ever told you about it, because over the years, complexity&amp;mdash;mandating...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/10/11/passwords-are-here-to-stay.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21942" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>And finally, standard user malware</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/09/01/and-finally-standard-user-malware.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/09/01/and-finally-standard-user-malware.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T06:21:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T06:21:00Z</updated><content type="html">Today I finally got wind of my first piece of true standard user malware. MS Antispyware 2008 has turned standard user. The version in question installs the binaries in c:\documents and settings\all users\application data\&amp;lt;something&amp;gt;, and makes itself resident by infecting HKCU\...\Run. Curiously, the legitimate anti-malware program (one of the top 3) failed to detect the infector. Obviously, this version is much easier to remove than the ones that require admin privileges. However, MS Antispyware...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/09/01/and-finally-standard-user-malware.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /><category term="Least Privilege" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Least+Privilege/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Microsoft Poland Empowers White People</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/26/microsoft-poland-empowers-white-people.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/26/microsoft-poland-empowers-white-people.aspx</id><published>2009-08-26T05:53:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-26T05:53:00Z</updated><content type="html">In an absolutely astonishing move Microsoft&amp;#39;s Polish subsidiary decided to do some photoshopping on its Business Productivity Infrastructure page to tailor it to the Polish market. Here you can see the U.S. original . In one of the least sensitive moves this year, the Polish subsidiary decided that black people in Poland do not need to be empowered, so here you can see what its version of that page looked like for a few hours today. As you can see from the current version on the Polish site ...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/26/microsoft-poland-empowers-white-people.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21899" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Thinking differently" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Thinking+differently/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Is it ActiveX that is the problem?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/09/is-it-activex-that-is-the-problem.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/09/is-it-activex-that-is-the-problem.aspx</id><published>2009-08-09T20:04:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-09T20:04:00Z</updated><content type="html">Last week, an expert from Verizon, nee Cybertrust, posted a note about the Active Template Library (ATL) security vulnerability over on the Verizon Business Security Blog . For home users, the phone company now advises you to use a different browser, ostensibly because IE and ActiveX are inherently insecure. I felt that quite missed the point that (a) browsers are software, and (b) all software has vulnerabilities, and (c) extension technologies in browsers add functionality, which (d) is implemented...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/08/09/is-it-activex-that-is-the-problem.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21827" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Warning: The software you are installing does not match your mental model</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/21/warning-the-software-you-are-installing-does-not-match-your-mental-model.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/21/warning-the-software-you-are-installing-does-not-match-your-mental-model.aspx</id><published>2009-07-21T05:10:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-21T05:10:00Z</updated><content type="html">Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE This morning I talked to my dad. After a few minutes of polite small talk, I heard the 10 little words I have come to dread: &amp;ldquo;I had some problems with my computer the other day.&amp;rdquo; The video card on his laptop had died. The screen was just black. He has a Dell Vostro, so he called Dell Technical Support. They sent a contractor technician out; with a motherboard. The technician, having no real qualifications other than the need for a job; and...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/21/warning-the-software-you-are-installing-does-not-match-your-mental-model.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21773" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Thinking differently" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Thinking+differently/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Steve Riley Lands On His Feet</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/steve-riley-lands-on-his-feet.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/steve-riley-lands-on-his-feet.aspx</id><published>2009-07-10T23:13:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-10T23:13:00Z</updated><content type="html">In May, in one of the more inexplicable moves this year, Microsoft laid off my good friend Steve Riley, four days before he was to deliver half a dozen presentations at TechEd. Fortunately, it did not take Steve long to find a new gig. This Monday, he starts as the latest Evangelist &amp;amp; Strategist for Amazon Web Services ! I&amp;#39;m very very happy for Steve, and very excited about what he can do in that role. Web Services are where the future is, and Steve is extremely well suited to the role. Please...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/steve-riley-lands-on-his-feet.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21740" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>A better, more reliable, work-around for the Microsoft Video Control Vulnerability</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/a-better-more-reliable-work-around-for-the-microsoft-video-control-vulnerability.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/a-better-more-reliable-work-around-for-the-microsoft-video-control-vulnerability.aspx</id><published>2009-07-10T06:09:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-10T06:09:00Z</updated><content type="html">For the past few days I&amp;#39;ve been following the Microsoft Video Control Vulnerability with interest. Basically, it&amp;#39;s another vulnerable ActiveX control that needs killbitted. Last night, Microsoft posted a work-around which involves using a Group Policy ADM template (ADM is the template format that was deprecated in Vista and Windows Server 2008). Unfortunately, the template tattoos the registry, which is not really recommended. I contemplated for a while writing a work-around for this issue...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/07/10/a-better-more-reliable-work-around-for-the-microsoft-video-control-vulnerability.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=21732" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Windows Security" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Windows+Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Vista" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Windows+Vista/default.aspx" /><category term="Mitigations" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Mitigations/default.aspx" /><category term="Windows Server 2008" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Windows+Server+2008/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Are Identity Theft Services Worth The Cost?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/03/23/are-identity-theft-services-worth-the-cost.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/03/23/are-identity-theft-services-worth-the-cost.aspx</id><published>2009-03-24T04:01:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-24T04:01:00Z</updated><content type="html">The Consumer Federation of America just published a report on identity theft services entitled &amp;quot; Are Identity Theft Services Worth The Cost? &amp;quot; The conclusion is that many are not, and that regulation is needed in that industry. It is a very interesting read....(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/03/23/are-identity-theft-services-worth-the-cost.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Privacy" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Privacy/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Please do not e-mail my social security number</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx</id><published>2009-01-28T05:38:00Z</published><updated>2009-01-28T05:38:00Z</updated><content type="html">Recently I had a very interesting incident. I wrote an article some time in 2008 and the publisher paid me a little bit of money for it. That means the publisher must send a report to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS - the U.S. tax department) reporting that they paid me, as well as send me a form called a 1099 form that I can use to report this money on my tax return. A few days ago the comptroller for the publisher sent me an e-mail asking for my social security number (my national ID number for...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2009/01/27/please-do-not-e-mail-my-social-security-number.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12571" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx" /><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Kip Hawley: "No, the TSA is Necessary Because This is War!"</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/kip-hawley-quot-no-the-tsa-is-necessary-because-this-is-war-quot.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/kip-hawley-quot-no-the-tsa-is-necessary-because-this-is-war-quot.aspx</id><published>2008-12-24T10:44:00Z</published><updated>2008-12-24T10:44:00Z</updated><content type="html">CBS News did a story a few days ago on the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Basically it was a tit-for-tat between Bruce Schneier , security pontificator extraordinaire, and Kip Hawley, the administrator of the TSA. Mr. Hawley&amp;#39;s maintans that the TSA provides a necessary service because we are at war, and the obvious battleground, apparently, is airplanes. Surely, we must all realize that just because the terrorists used airplanes once, they can&amp;#39;t possibly have enough imagination...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/kip-hawley-quot-no-the-tsa-is-necessary-because-this-is-war-quot.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12372" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>One "Hacker" Attempts to Rule The World</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/one-quot-hacker-quot-attempts-to-rule-the-world.aspx" /><id>/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/one-quot-hacker-quot-attempts-to-rule-the-world.aspx</id><published>2008-12-24T08:40:00Z</published><updated>2008-12-24T08:40:00Z</updated><content type="html">Wired, always a source for amusement and interesting literature, just carried a story on a &amp;quot;hacker&amp;quot; (the magazine&amp;#39;s use of the term equates to &amp;quot;criminal&amp;quot;) who attempted to dominate the market in stolen credit cards. It&amp;#39;s a neat story about an unsavory character who is not going to get enough prison time. If you are too busy to read it, here is a synopsis: --- Once upon a time, there lived in a far away land an evil dark lord. He lived in a dark castle with all kinds of...(&lt;a href="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/2008/12/24/one-quot-hacker-quot-attempts-to-rule-the-world.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://msinfluentials.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12369" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>http://msinfluentials.com/members/Anonymous/default.aspx</uri></author><category term="Security Pontification" scheme="http://msinfluentials.com/blogs/mobilejesper/archive/tags/Security+Pontification/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>